<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OLKC2006 paper</title>
	<link>http://www.jpaarons.net/dubbings/2006/02/28/olkc2006-paper</link>
	<description>The diverse didacticism of Jeremy Aarons</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Synesthesia &#187; More about conversations and processes</title>
		<link>http://www.jpaarons.net/dubbings/2006/02/28/olkc2006-paper#comment-155</link>
		<author>Synesthesia &#187; More about conversations and processes</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jpaarons.net/dubbings/2006/02/28/olkc2006-paper#comment-155</guid>
					<description>[...] I&#8217;ve a hunch that the&#160;conceptual models discussed in&#160; Jeremy Aarons&#8217; new paper, (as I summarised here) could be a useful lever for unpicking the dilemma I found when I wrote that I prefer conversation, but you need process. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;ve a hunch that the&nbsp;conceptual models discussed in&nbsp; Jeremy Aarons&#8217; new paper, (as I summarised here) could be a useful lever for unpicking the dilemma I found when I wrote that I prefer conversation, but you need process. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
